Ceramic Vs Reflective Tint 3m crystalline tint is it worth the cash 3m crystalline window Source: media.nbcmontana.com Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue. 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle.
I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. I have my appointment tomorrow. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint. 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding. The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. Crystalline is $100 more at $250.
3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. I would not want a brown hue personally. The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. #4 · oct 25, 2016. We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. I put my hand in front of each. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat.
Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2? It can block 95% visible light. What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield. When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%.
Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than.
Does the 3M Crystalline tint provide more or less UV protection than the 3M Ceramic IR tint Source: mechanics.stackexchange.com The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. I have my appointment tomorrow. This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2? 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding. No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%.
You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. I put my hand in front of each. Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films;
#4 · oct 25, 2016. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield. 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. It can block 95% visible light. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic.
Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other Crystalline is $100 more at $250. I would not want a brown hue personally. 3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible.
The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle. Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint.
Ceramic Vs Reflective Tint 3m crystalline tint is it worth the cash 3m crystalline window Source: media.nbcmontana.com No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level.
3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%. Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2?
This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint. Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. I would not want a brown hue personally.
Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. I put my hand in front of each. I have my appointment tomorrow. The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle. You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue. #4 · oct 25, 2016. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield.
With that being said, i like the xpel product more. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; It can block 95% visible light. Crystalline is $100 more at $250.
Glass coating and tinting Ontario California and 3M Automotive tinting. Source: www.xactwindowtinting.com #4 · oct 25, 2016. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. I would not want a brown hue personally. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. Crystalline is $100 more at $250. The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; It can block 95% visible light.
I have my appointment tomorrow. 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding. The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield. When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle. I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun.
The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2? 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue. 3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint. Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light
That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%. No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post.
Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. I put my hand in front of each. This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel.
Huper Optik vs 3M Crystalline Window Tint Z Source: windowtintz.com When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. 3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. I put my hand in front of each. This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%.
I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection.
Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. It can block 95% visible light. This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2? Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint. All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. I would not want a brown hue personally. Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology.
Crystalline is $100 more at $250. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield. I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue. I have my appointment tomorrow. Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding.
This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. #4 · oct 25, 2016. Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle.
Huper Optik vs 3M Crystalline Window Tint Z Source: windowtintz.com It can block 95% visible light. The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint. I have my appointment tomorrow. Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle.
This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light Crystalline is $100 more at $250. Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2? We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022.
#4 · oct 25, 2016. This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other I would not want a brown hue personally. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. 3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs.
Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. I put my hand in front of each.
It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding. No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield.
3M Crystalline vs Suntek Ceramic YouTube Source: www.youtube.com You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. It can block 95% visible light. Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2? 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; I have my appointment tomorrow. Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding.
The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle.
What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; 3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. I would not want a brown hue personally. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%. Crystalline is $100 more at $250.
No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint. I put my hand in front of each. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue.
Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. #4 · oct 25, 2016.
Huper Optik vs 3M Crystalline Source: windowtintz.com Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. I have my appointment tomorrow. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield. The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare.
When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. Crystalline is $100 more at $250. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%. This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light
We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; I would not want a brown hue personally. 3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding. The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color.
3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2? 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. I put my hand in front of each. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint.
Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. #4 · oct 25, 2016. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline. It can block 95% visible light.
Ceramic Vs Reflective Tint 3m crystalline tint is it worth the cash 3m crystalline window Source: media.nbcmontana.com I would not want a brown hue personally. All llumar tints block 99% of uv, while some 3m films provide less than this. Aug 11, 2020 · llumar vs. This permit you to enjoy all the benefits of natural light #4 · oct 25, 2016. 3m tint warranty both brands provide a limited lifetime warranty when installed by authorized professionals. Reading on the 3m crystalline vs. I have my appointment tomorrow. It can block 95% visible light. Even through a microscope, you will not be able to see the 3m ceramic car tint.
This video compares the performance of two window films to see how well they do against each other The 3m film is slightly better in reducing glare. You can apply completely clear film, with no tint grade, and still receive 97% ir rejection. With that being said, i like the xpel product more. 3m is not ceramic based where as xpel is. It blocks more ir which, based on my understanding. Please note i am basing this on the limited information i had at the time of this post. No other product can match 3m crystalline in raw performance and protection. I've decided to tint the windshield because i'm tired of the car blowing cold air on me while my face and arms are on fire from the sun. 3m crystalline has a brownish sand hue to it when looking at it whereas the xpel products are true black or a bluish hue.
The 3m ceramic ir autofilm offers great infrared heat rejection for optimal comfort and is available in an attractive neutral color. 3m tint film can block up to 99% of the harmful uv rays. Ceramic film from 3m is made of multiple layers of ceramic and is powered by nanotechnology. 3m ceramic tint vs 3m crystalline argyle high school football tickets fallout 4 hunting revolver mod what does the following monday mean minister of science visit january 13, 2022. 3m says 97% ir heat rejection and xpel says 98%. The film is extremely thin and is almost invisible. I'm torn between ceramic and crystalline. 3m crystalline tint rejects more than heat than other dark films; We understand it can get confusing, which is why we decided to help you by comparing 3m crystalline and ceramic. Is there a huge noticeable difference in between the 2?
When you see the skin cancer foundation seal of recommendation for our 3m automotive window film crystalline series, ceramic ir series and obsidian series, this distinction is based on testing qualifications meeting the skin cancer foundation criteria and standards established by their photobiology committee to block 99% or more of uva and uvb radiation. You'll get a much better effect in terms of darkness when going with a darker tint or lightness (oem) when going with a lighter tint using xpel. Adds an extra layer of security to your vehicles; The 3m 50% heat reduction film was much cooler than suntek's 50% heat reduction film. Not sure this matters since 3m seems to have the same level. I put my hand in front of each. I have 3m ceramic ir 70% on the front of my windshield. 3m crystalline is for the person that wants the maximum level of protection for their vehicle. This unique technology is the reason a clear film can reject more heat than. That said, even after spending $600 on 3m crystalline for my cayman, based on preliminary data i'd prefer huper optik ceramic over 3m crystalline.
Protection the brands provide similar protection against heat. These films reject almost 60% of the solar energy; What are the pros of installing a 3m tint? Crystalline is $100 more at $250.
Post a Comment
0 Comments